In a fascinating speculation on what might have happened had Hannibal defeated Rome, Freeman also disputes many modern scholars’ belief that history unfolds solely from economic and cultural forces, insisting that “certain individuals at certain moments in time can change everything with a single decision.” And Hannibal profoundly changed Rome. We should do nothing less,” writes the author, though he refrains from romanticizing his subject. “Even the Romans, in their fear and hatred of Hannibal, could not help but admire his determination, brilliance, and ultimately his humanity.
In defeat, having turned his energies to rebuilding Carthage’s economy, he proved an able administrator. Despite the Roman chroniclers who demonized him, tradition holds that Hannibal, though capable of wholesale slaughter, was, by the standards of the day, generous in battle and humane in his treatment of his men and war animals, with an extraordinary gift for eliciting loyalty. Freeman also gives full credit to the recent work of scholars who have helped illuminate Hannibal’s character and legacy as well as the world in which he lived.
The author draws from both of the two most important sources of information on his subject’s life (and legend), but he favors the more balanced, detailed account of Polybius over that of Livy, the Roman historian most hostile to the African leader. A thorough, largely sympathetic account of the career of one of the ancient world’s most indelible and complex figures.įreeman, the chair in humanities at Pepperdine whose more than 20 books include biographies of Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar, vividly, almost cinematically, brings to life the career of Hannibal Barca, the great but ill-fated Carthaginian general whose tactical and strategic brilliance is still studied today.
0 kommentar(er)
